AMP in the post
Folks seem fixated on former Prince Andrew, now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Notably, even the fact that he lives a much quieter life these days, doesn’t mean he escapes attention. Recently, a podcast revealed something that a lot of folks think seemed blown out of all proportion. Read on for more details.
The Podcast And Andrew
On Monday on The Jeremy Kyle Breakfast Show on YouTube, guest Kinsey Schofield talked about the Duke of York. During the show, the panel giggled about Saturday Night Live and Keir Starmer before turning to the fact that Andrew walked his dogs in Windsor.
While the podcast leaned into former prince Andrew’s downfall, some royal family followers thought it all became a bit too much. Why is that? Well, they discussed walking the dog for a while. That backfired, and possibly it’s not because folks don’t want news about Andrew.
Walking The Dog!
In fact, royal family watchers seem keen for more about Andrew’s alleged trade secret leaks, association with Jeffrey Epstein, suspected corruption, or even possibly, espionage. So, that might account for why people thought the discussion about dog walking seemed a bit sick.
AMP in the post
By that, we mean, “Oh! Shock and horror, the brother of King Charles walked his dog!!!” Plus, it didn’t go down too well that such a simple chore could possibly become a social media talking point.
Interestingly, in the comments section, more than a handful of people displayed a few rare moments of defense for Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Or, more accurately, for his dog. Some of them pointed out that regardless of how they feel about Andrew himself, the animals shouldn’t form part of the scandal.
Viewers Weigh In
One viewer noted that “the dogs shouldn’t suffer” and they certainly “need to be walked.” Overall, there seemed to be a general feeling that constantly tracking every single thing that Andrew does, seems wrong.
AMP in the post
In fact, one irritated viewer opined that it starts feeling like “unadulterated sensationalist reporting.” Meanwhile, others think it seemed over the top to even mention it in a headline that smacked of grabbing a “few minutes of fame.”
Distraction Theories?
Perhaps you also saw comments on social media that Andrew, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry articles are merely paid stories to distract from wealthy elites in the Epstein Files. Well, if there’s anyone out there dishing cash, please send them our way.
As usual, life goes on with SEO, Google, keywords, and knowing your subject. So, probably, Kinsey Schofield and the panel simply discussed something for a different angle.
And, in defense of Jeremy, he did note that he didn’t invent the story, but others published it “as front page news.” Additionally, Schofield also talked about how she doesn’t feel that “we should be seeing him walking his dogs.”
But notably, others didn’t see it that way.
More Responses
Here are a few more responses from the discussion about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor:
- If people like the TWO OF YOU STOP talking about this … he WILL shrivel up and disappear. he APPEARS ALL THE TIME , as you continue TALK about him. he must be treated as nonexistent and the problem will be solved.
- The dog has done nothing wrong and needs its daily walkies!
- I do not like Andrew but surely he can walk his dog! Good exercise for the dog!
- Why cannot Andrew simply walk his dog.. hurts no-one at all…and is certainly not headline news…
What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below, and come back here often for all your royal family news and updates.