King Charles Forced To Keep Prince Andrew And Sarah Ferguson At The Royal Lodge For This Reason
- 0Facebook
- 1Twitter
- 0Pinterest
- Total1
Royal Family News says that while King Charles might have evicted Prince Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson from The Royal Lodge, he’s going to want to step back from that decision.
Now that it’s been announced that the Duchess of York has been diagnosed with breast cancer, the King of England will look like the King of No Hearts if he decides to kick Andrew and Sarah to the curb. Here’s what you need to know.
King Charles Forced To Keep Prince Andrew And Sarah Ferguson At The Royal Lodge For This Reason
Just this weekend, it was revealed that Sarah Ferguson has breast cancer. Yet, a spokesperson for the duchess has already revealed that the surgery was good and that her prognosis is even better.
The royal mother-of-two even spoke about the diagnosis on her new podcast, Tea Talks with the Duchess and Sarah. However, it has been noted that she recorded the segment well before her operation.
Because of this new revelation, the last thing that King Charles will want to do is continue with his eviction of Andrew and Sarah at The Royal Lodge. He would certainly look heartless if he did.
Even though Andrew and Sarah have been divorced for nearly three decades now, they still remain very close and live together, but separately. That might be one of the reasons why King Charles had decided not to invite Sarah to his Coronation, even though she is still considered a part of the royal family, even if she is an ex-wife.
What’s Next For Sarah Ferguson?
Interestingly enough, Prince William and Kate Middleton, who were supposed to move on to The Royal Lodge after Andrew’s eviction have pulled back on their plans. Clearly, they also don’t want to look like heartless royals by kicking out Sarah Ferguson when she’s going through a very difficult time in her life right now. Now as far as how long Andrew and Sarah remain at The Royal Lodge remains to be seen. Watch this space.
So far Buckingham Palace has not made any comments about the matter.
Tell us celebrity gossip fans, how do you feel about this story? Contribute to the buzz by dropping us a line with your thoughts in our comments section below. Also, come back here for all the latest news about your favorite Hollywood and reality television stars right here.
Editorial credit: Heide Pinkall / Shutterstock.com
- 0Facebook
- 1Twitter
- 0Pinterest
- 0LinkedIn
- Total1
This is a horrible article, Charles does not own Frogmore Cottage, it belongs to the Crown Estates amd has a separate govt body to run it. This is just to create drama and trouble for the royal family by printing LIES about the royal family.
Andrew and Fergie can well afford to live someplace else to live, even if on the royal premises There is nothing wrong with that I too had breast cancer, lost both breasts, survived and now am cancer free I moved when the time was necessary, without any interference from anyone I am glad Fergie is doing well and wish her only the best Her former husband can well afford to find someplace else to live and step down, as he should. He has defamed the crown and should have to pay for his crude and rude behavior He is no better than anyone else . It is time for him top put his big boy pants on and do the manly thing. He is not a child, he is a grown man so act like one The king is putting up with lots of bs and once he lets go of all the bs and put his foot down then people will take him serious Why should they do that now as everyone is ruling him King Charles must stick to his original plan No empathy is needed here If the shoe was on the other foot and the stipulation was the same I am sure Charles would have gotten the boot Let the Brits be proud of Charles and let the king show he really is a man of his word He will be respected more that way