Prince Harry and Meghan Have Shown They’re Now More Out Of Touch Than Ever

Recent developments highlight the challenging public perception Prince Harry and Meghan Markle face, even when engaging in acts of compassion. During a visit to Pasadena, Los Angeles, to comfort wildfire survivors, the couple’s efforts were met with scorn rather than praise.

Hollywood filmmaker Justine Bateman sharply criticized their actions on social media, labeling them “disaster tourists” in what she described as a “repulsive photo op.” Bateman’s comments resonated with many online, amplifying the narrative that the Sussexes’ intentions are more about self-promotion than genuine care.

Popularity Decline?

This incident reflects the steep decline in their popularity. Critics argue that the couple’s ongoing public statements and projects, including Prince Harry’s memoir and their infamous Oprah interview, have cemented their reputation as out-of-touch and self-righteous figures. For some, even gestures of goodwill are dismissed as calculated moves.

Adding to their troubles, Harry and Meghan recently issued a joint statement condemning Meta’s decision to reduce content moderation on Facebook.

The statement criticized the social media giant for prioritizing profit over public safety, accusing it of enabling hate speech, division, and a broader mental health crisis. They alleged that Meta’s actions undermine diversity and democracy while placing marginalized communities at risk.

However, their statement has been met with skepticism and derision by commentators. Michael Deacon, a columnist for The Telegraph, described their response as a “631-word whine” filled with outdated liberal clichés.

He argued that the Sussexes are disconnected from the current public mood, clinging to slogans and ideologies that no longer resonate with many.

According to Deacon, their stance reflects a broader pattern of control disguised as kindness, highlighting the growing public fatigue with such rhetoric.

Prince Harry’s Vulgar Slur, Suggests King Charles Is Bullying Him

View Story

Criticizing Meta’s Decision

The backlash is not limited to public commentators. Imran Ahmed, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, also criticized Meta’s decision but from a different perspective.

He warned that rolling back content moderation in favor of a community-driven system could exacerbate the spread of harmful misinformation, hate speech, and scams.

Ahmed described Meta’s approach as a dangerous abdication of responsibility, leaving users vulnerable to falsehoods and harmful content.

While the Sussexes’ intentions may be noble, the polarized reactions to their actions suggest a significant disconnect between their messaging and public sentiment.

Whether addressing social issues or engaging in charitable work, their efforts often seem to backfire, raising questions about their strategy and how they are perceived in an ever-critical media landscape.

Be sure to catch up on everything happening with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle right now. Come back here often for all Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spoilers, news, and updates.