Well, it seems like no matter what Prince Andrew might have done or said in the past, it seems like a lot of people in Britain will say that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle did much worse – if that’s even possible at all. There’s a new report that says Prince Andrew’s $3 million annual private security bill will be paid by none other than King Charles III himself. Here’s what you need to know.
AMP in the post
Royal Family News – Prince Andrew’s Private Security Bill Will Be Footed By King Charles At The Tune Of $3 Million
Here’s what The Telegraph writes, “The Duke of York is said to have written to the Home Office and Scotland Yard to complain about losing his police protection. His entitlement to taxpayer-funded bodyguards was subjected to a full review after he was relieved of his duties as a working royal by Queen Elizabeth II earlier this year, shortly before agreeing a hefty financial settlement with Virginia Guiffre, his sex abuse accuser.
The Duke of York has always strenuously denied her allegations. While he is understood to have enjoyed the benefits of police protection since then, the deal is believed to be coming to an end.”
Yet, in the Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan, the Duke of Sussex complained that the withdrawal of his family’s own taxpayer-funded security left their lives in danger.
As many royal fans know by now, Harry launched a legal challenge in which he argued that it was unfair that he did not know the details surrounding the decision to withdraw his permanent security team.
AMP in the post
Apparently, this all come about soon after Harry and Meghan pulled the plug on their working relationship with the royal family. Harry has stated in the past that he felt it was dangerous to bring his family back home to the UK because of his lack of security detail.
Royal Family News – What’s Next For The Royals?
Wharfe says that Harry made the “unwise” decision of playing his hand in this matter. He told the Mirror’s Pod Save the Queen podcast: “I don’t know whom he advised him to take legal action against the British Government and the Metropolitan Police. I think it was an unwise thing to do because that, in essence, raises negative publicity.”
Wharfe added: “But I think the Government and the Metropolitan Police would have seen it would have been wrong to see this man, a global icon and celebrity in his own right, step onshore in the United Kingdom without any protection whatsoever.”
AMP in the post
We will update you with all of the latest information as it comes in. In the meantime, let us know what you think with your thoughts in our comments section again. Be sure to catch up with everything on the British Royal Family right now. Come back here often for the British Royal Family news and updates.