AMP in the post
They had a cry fest with Oprah Winfrey which aired Sunday night and said that they were denied protection yet their accusation has been branded as “arrogant” among other things.
Did they really think it appropriate or called for that the UK taxpayers would pay an estimated $5.5 million each year after they fled the country for what they termed “financial freedom?”
Royal Family News – One Top Cop Throws Shade On Markle Protection Claims
“It shows you their naivety and sense of entitlement,” retired chief superintendent Dai Davies, who headed the UK’s royalty protection unit, told the Daily Mail. “It was simply arrogant to presume they and their baby would get protection.”
Each of the Markle’s complained long and loud to Oprah Winfrey about losing their royal security detail even though it was they who blindsided the monarchy by throwing down their crown jewels and leaving the family in the lurch based on their bigger lust for making money elsewhere.
AMP in the post
Royal Family News – The Markle’s Are Naïve And Entitled?
Harry claimed the yanking of protection came at “short notice” and was the reason behind their breaking of COVID-19 lockdown rules when they left a borrowed Canada mansion for a borrowed California mansion.
According to the couple, Tyler Perry offered them security along with his mansion.
It’s curious that they refused to pay for their own security since the Duke and Duchess of Sussex quit their royal duties after bragging that they would be “financially independent.”
Canadians were not pleased that the couple landed there expecting a huge handout and when they subsequently fled to the US President Donald Trump put the couple on notice not to expect any freebies from America either.
AMP in the post
Royal Family News – The Markle’s Expected Free Security
Davies said he was “gobsmacked” that the couple expected British taxpayers to keep paying for them after they abandoned the country.
He said, “It was utterly unrealistic to think they could continue to have their royal protection team working in America, in fact it would have put [police] lives at risk.”
He said that British police are only allowed to protect royals in the US as part of a “reciprocal agreement” for “occasions like official state visits.”
“But British officers couldn’t just carry on working there, unable to bear firearms and with no access to integrated intelligence from the security services,” he said. “It was unworkable.”
Be sure to catch up on everything happening with the royal family. Come back here often for royal family spoilers, news and updates.