Prince Harry & Meghan Markle Face Fresh Attack From Royal Commentator

The return of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to the United Kingdom brought a flurry of speculation from various commentators and experts. On Tuesday, another popular analyst added his take to it. Read on for more details.

Royal commentator Neil Sean discussed the ongoing drama between Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, and the British royal family during his Daily News Headlines vlog on YouTube Tuesday night.

The Photo That Hasn’t Happened

Sean often claims to have contacts inside the palace. Sean talked about the fact that there is still no photo of King Charles with Harry and his children. In his opinion, getting that picture would be a “million-pound project.”

 So, why hasn’t it happened? According to Sean, the problem might be Prince Harrys wife ‘rather than reluctance from the palace.

Dissing Harry’s Therapy

Sean believes Meghan is firmly in control of the situation. From the start, he blamed her for the changes he sees in Harry.

He said that Harry seemed “perfectly acceptable” before his relationship with her and that his current behaviour, including his use of “therapy speak,” came after moving to LA.

Sean said, “Now, I’m not knocking people that go for therapy, but what you have to remember is that Harry seemed in many people’s eyes perfectly acceptable prior to moving to the USA.” He added that in the past, “Harry was kind of balanced.”

Addressing Thomas Markle

Sean also mentioned Thomas Markle, who he claimed was cut off by Meghan and she showed no interest in making amends with him, even as he ages and faces health issues.

He found it “incredible” that Harry has never met his father-in-law and suggested Harry was “not allowed” to do so. In Sean’s telling, Meghan controls the narrative and Harry simply follows along.

Sean also questioned why Meghan appeared willing to reconcile with Harry’s father, King Charles, while remaining estranged from her own.

The Invictus Games

Sean also speculated about the Invictus Games. He said Harry would love “royal stardust” at the event, but warned that the King should not attend because it would become “all about” Harry and his wife.

He admitted that if the King skips it, “it doesn’t look good,” but he still advised King Charles against going.

Sean framed the entire situation as a personal failure on the part of Meghan Markle. He praised King Charles and Queen Camilla for “playing a blinder” and refusing to let Harry and Meghan “trample over everything that they’ve done.”

Claims Versus Evidence

Neil Sean did not name any sources to support the claims he made. And he didn’t consider that Harry might have his own reasons for keeping his distance from Thomas Markle.

Regarding the “million-pound” photo, he didn’t suggest that it might raise privacy or security concerns for the palace.

Instead, Sean presented Meghan as the villain and Harry as someone caught up in her “spin cycle of PR madness.” Apart from that, he suggested that eventually, Meghan will say that she “tried to reach out” to her father.

To be fair, Sean approaches the royal family largely as entertainment. His commentary can be engaging, and some of his predictions have proved correct, but much of this particular analysis was speculation.

Viewers React

In the comments section, it became clear that few of Sean’s followers disagreed with his take on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

One of them wrote, “Invictus should kick harry to the curb. They can survive with corporate patronage – a royal sprinkle is fine but not necessary to continue.”

Here are a few more responses from the discussion:

• “Harry is “not allowed” to speak to Thomas Markle because Thomas Markle knows ALL – A.L.L. of Meghan’s secrets.”
• “The King will be a total fool if he allows a conciliatory photograph with the Sussexes and the children to go public.”
• “Its Guru spin not therapy! Harry must be afraid to face the truth about himself!”

That’s not to say there were no dissenters, and someone wrote:

Harry [was] balanced before he met Markle? Have you forgotten his troublesome time at Eton and his late teens/early twenties? Even his army times are marred with tales of how he treated women and spent a lot of time playing computer games. It’s too easy to blame Markle for his behaviour, she just provides yet another excuse for him to evade responsibilities for his actions.

Your thoughts? Join the discussion and then come back for more royal family news and updates.