AMP in the post
It looks like Meghan Markle isn’t the only person who is about to make some serious changes in her life now that she’s engaged to Prince Harry. New reports indicate that the young royal has quit smoking in an effort to please his health-conscious fiancé.
As many royal fans know, Prince Harry has been an avid smoker since his college days. And even though smoking is officially banned on the grounds of Kensington Palace, Prince Harry has managed to sneak in a smoke break during visits to his local pubs of during his nights out with his pals. But now he has reportedly dropped the bad habit altogether at the request of his future wife, Meghan Markle.
Related: Meghan Markle To Spend Christmas With Prince Harry & The Royal Family
“Harry has promised no smoking at all at home. It’s not nice for Meghan as a non-smoker,” a friend of the couple told the Mail on Sunday. “So there’s no more hanging out of the window for a quick puff. Harry has quit for Meghan.”
Meghan, who is best known for her role on the USA legal drama Suits, is very conscious of the things she eats and how she takes care of her body. She works out and is a huge fan of yoga. Plus, she only indulges in her favorite snacks and sweets once a year, and that is on her birthday. Now that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are soon going to get married, Meghan wants to make sure that Harry makes his health a priority, too. That’s why she’s encouraged him to quit smoking and to get in shape.
Of course, Prince Harry isn’t the only person who will be making radical changes to his lifestyle before they tie the knot. She has officially quit Hollywood and her role on Suits. She’s also selling her Toronto home and she prepares for the biggest transition of her life: from a private citizen to a royal princess. It’s a huge challenge, but one that Meghan Markle is willing to accept.
AMP in the post
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are reportedly getting married at Windsor Castle in May of 2018.
Also, don’t forget to check back with Celebrating the Soaps for all your latest news, updates on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle!
Image credit: Photo by Chris Jackson/Getty Images
I wonder what will really happen with their “relationship”. Still not convinced it won’t go “poof” in one way or another.
Hey! I’m still highly skeptical about the whole relationship.
Do you recall, about 20 years ago (I know it’s a while), that details of how Ranier and Grace Kelly really got together? Rainer was passing his prime, unwed and with no heir. Under the constitution that gave independence to the state of Monte Carlo/Monaco, should Ranier have not produced a successor, the principality would have reverted to French rule and lost it’s independence.
Monaco was the playground of the elite and famous. It also had a very sophisticated criminal element that ensured the big players received all manner of financial “assistance” to avoid paying taxes and launder the ill-gotten gains. Many of these characters were the Hollywood elite – studio heads, financiers and A grade actors.
It was decided, by a small group of these Hollywood movers and shakers that a Hollywood star would be just the ticket to prevent Monaco losing its independence. A list of A-league actresses was draw up with Gene Tierney and Heddy Larmar filling the top two spots. Grace Kelly came in at fourth or fifth. Apparently, no-one else on the list was particularly keen to be a princess and live in a pink castle, apart from Ms Kelly, who’d accumulated so many notches on her bed-head, it was only worthwhile for kindling. I recall Frank Sinatra was involved in many of the negotiations; it seems wherever there was nefarious activity was afoot, so was Frank. So that’s the “fairytale” of Grace and Ranier.
I’m not suggesting anything approximating this is happening with Harry and Markle, but I think more of us are open to skepticism between the official version and the version which is, essentially, a proposition which might result in a tired, irrelevant institution shutting up shop in the not too distant future, and the Monarchy given a brief respite from extinction with the addition of a new and controversial face popping up.
Gawd – what a story. I believe it. There must have been some attraction between them, or it would seem, all the same ? Oh yes,HollyWeird has always been beyond what most people could ever guess !
I’ve found another astrologer online who also,like myself, doubts that the Harry/Markle thing will last. Only he thinks if they change the month of the wedding it would help – !
That’s so laughable…….
What he thinks he’s found out is only a SYMPTOM of the HUGE problems in their relationship charts. And their upcoming solar charts. It’s all the same. Forget he wedding date – !
“Matthew Currie” wrote the article…he’s a “pro” astrologer, I’m not professional but I still say he’s wrong in assuming all they have to do to make it work is change the month they marry in.To me that’s very short-sighted.
And I’m still going to keep looking, I’ve read a few articles that supposedly looked at the astrology, but I’m not done yet. I flat out think they won’t marry, or if they do it will fail, and won’t take long to fail. And that’s going by what I found out for myself, by looking at everything from their relationship charts to their solar charts.
Have you heard the stories that the royals consult court astrologers to determine the most auspicious periods for important events? I’m quite sure I’ve read that a few times over the years.
If so, they need a new astrologer. I think they go by other things as well, like when Waity and Wimpo married during the Beltane.
My mistake. I forgot they were into the dark side of the occult.
How can you forget !
🙂
I know Elizabeth the 1st had John Dee back in Tudor times !
No,wouldn’t be surprised but I’d wonder about the skillevel. I’ve read other astrologers saying Wimpo married at a wrong time of year. And I’ve heard them {multiple astrologers} saying the same thing about Stupid Harry.
I never did go back over Harry/Snarkle’s astrology, but it just looks awful in general,including what I wrote about them already. If I can I’ll look at them again – I’m still curious about finding out more.
They were really taking a beating on the Daily Mail. But I think you know about those articles !
🙂
🙂
:}
You know, something similar {as to what you said} also crossed my mind but I dropped it fast when the astrology distracted me.
Somewhere on a chat board, I made a comment that MeAgain Markle being an actress might not be an accident ,maybe the marriage was being set up and she’s an actress and will go to it, and act, as part of a plan. I don’t think Harry is the marriage type but he’s getting older and maybe the higher-ups in the family think he needs to “get married”.
If he ever does marry for love it might be to a man, not a woman…but being in the RF that would be impossible for him….so he plays the “bachelor”. And from the start I’ve said I don’t believe this stuff with Markle/ and doubt it will last.
Sorry-not getting all alerts.
Yes, I think there’s something in that theory. With the continuing debacle of Chuck, Camilla, Wills and Clueless that has resulted in the royals’ continuing slide down the greasy pole of popularity, particularly since the 20th anniversary of Diana’s death, it’s possible ‘The Way Ahead Group’ decided that the two royal happenings which guarantee a rise in the popularity polls are: the birth of a royal child and a royal wedding.
Middleton duly became pregnant and a very hastily arranged royal wedding is now six months away.
For a RF which has had a “whites-only” policy since it’s inception, the idea of Harry marrying Markle won’t sit easily for those of our vintage and older, however, for a reasonable percentage of the younger population, the idea that a member of the RF would marry a woman who is half African American, from a very “common” background, might persuade those who don’t know much about the BRF’s past and present history, that it has, in fact, become an inclusive institution, moving with changing social norms and values, is much less elitist and is actually still a relevant concept that shouldn’t be lightly discarded.
The fact that Ms Markle is an actress would appear to be a very clever move given the train-wreck that is Middleton. The first successful shot has already been fired, during the past few days, with Harry interviewing ex-President Obama.
My guess is that the head PR flack employed by the RF, who previously headed up the PR group that performed a minor miracle in turning the daggy, dated and irrelevant clothing house of Burberry into one of the most sought after, high-end fashion brands, must be rubbing his hands with glee.
However, up-branding trench coats is slightly different from up-branding a monolithic dinosaur of an institution whose members continue to behave in the same ridiculously entitled manner enjoyed by their forebears during the mid-20th century.
It’s much too early to make the call that the frenetic strategies being employed by the RF will result in the “Burberry effect”, but the fact that Charles recently commented that he had no desire to reside in Buckingham Palace, but rather use the structure as offices for those in the royal employ, particularly those charged with “Public Communications” would indicate the RF are prepared to pull out all the stops to achieve the ‘Burberry effect”.
Good thinking. Seriously. Sure,they’d think up something like that. Except they’re doing so badly at it, as you know,it’s literally funny. I thought Waity was the worst I’d ever seen,and now MeAgain Snarkle, just as bad ! In her own rotten way. Like you said,she’s more like a street rat,LOL.
Waity was just a street slut. Snarkle, “street rat”.
Oh my word – Harry interviewed OBAMA ?! Whatever for ? That’s like touching someone who’s got the pox !
Hell yes, if Chuck thinks he needs an entire palace to store the PR machine, sounds like he realizes he needs it.
True. After WWII, Monaco was facing bankruptcy.
Kelly’s father cut the deal with a “Dowery ” of $2 million dollars.
Grace was getting a reputation 5Hollywood, so Rainier got some seed money, saved the Principality, Grace got to keep her ‘Reputation ”
If you further research this.. Guess what Royal Family did not attend the 3 day festivities?
Yep! QEII thought this was beneath the dignity of Royalty to mix with Hollywood types. Philip wanted to go, but aquesed… Remember it was Diana they sent to her Funeral?
I think it was her first solo appearance representing the British Monarchy..
Thanks, P. -.I’d completely forgotten about Monaco’s financial woes. You’re VERY good with the details 🙂
Thank you. If you srcatch enough at the pavement, eventually you’ll hit dirt.
♥About 400 persons attended the funeral, including President Reagan’s wife, Nancy, Britain’s Princess Diana of Wales, French President Francois Mitterrand’s wifeReagan, wearing a broad-brimmed black hat, at several points wiped tears from her eyes. She and Princess Diana, wearing a black straw hat with a small veil, sat directly behind Rainier ?
??Now the downside is usually Uranus. Here we have her Uranus opposing his Moon. Hard Uranus aspects usually speak to lots of excitement, a rollercoaster kind of relationship, usually lots of breaks, and then an abrupt ending. Unless the couple can find a way to channel all that Uranus with other ways, but typically its hard to have a long term relationship with harsh Uranus aspects. Then, his Uranus squares her Venus. Brutal! That is usually very exciting at the beginning, but that aspect usually wears thin at some point.☀?
Not sure if you’re joking ?, but they have no Moon Opp Uranus in their composite and relationship charts. No Venus opp Uranus either.
But in their solar {separate} astrology there is a hard aspect between Venus and Uranus in his chart and a square from Saturn to Venus in hers. That’s not all either, but it’s not good.
It was on some Astrology site.
I remember what you said about “Uranus ” being dangerous.
I can’t read charts, I just copied this for your opinion.
Every time it’s incased with ⭐emoji.. It’s from another article.
OK,
🙂
I’m not sure where they got the idea of a Moon – Uranus opposition.
I read this as I was trying to find the several humaterian works that our Ms Snarkel was involved with.
I thought I’d let you read it to see if it made sense
This was published when they first started dating. I suppose they didn’t know the exact date 2this wedding.
OK. Still seems odd, if they had no clue about the wedding date then they must have been going off the birth charts, but they got it wrong. Strange.
Thanks though.
More insipid news from Snarkle-Land will keep rolling in,of course. At first I thought this was going to be a hoot, a gold mine of gossip, but I’m already so grossed out by MeAgain Snarkle that I’m not sure if I can take it anymore – !
LOL
I meant to add, Uranus isn’t always dangerous. With “easy” or soft aspects it usually isn’t.
Even with hard aspects like the square or opposition to Uranus, it doesn’t always mean you can expect disaster. But it’s full potential, if it comes out,can be pretty bad or hard on a relationship {it can also mean potential accidents and other things, and so on}.
I was confused , Harry DOES have a hard Venus -Uranus aspect in his solar 2018 astrology. Sorry ! I even forgot I’d posted that right here, below somewhere !
;0
You know what I think I might have been wrong about there being no hard Venus – Uranus aspect ! I need to look up what I found already –
but it sounds familiar.
I think I even stated something about it already.
I’ve been busy with to much lately ! I’m having issues remembering this astrology – ! I think the Venus to Uranus might have been in the lunar chart for May {when supposedly they’re getting married}.
I’m confusing myself and probably you too ! Auugghh !
🙂
I did find where I stated something about Venus -Uranus, it’s in Harry’s solar return for 2018. Its posted below. Sorry !
No.. No. It’s OK.
I don’t know squat about reading Astrology Charts.
You mentioned that you had a bad feeling because of the Uranus in the house. ♏?♍
This was something I copied ( cut and paste) from an article that was none to kind about the impending nuptials.. I thought you’d be interested in what they had to say.
Thank you for your reply..
I’m keeping my nose out of the Astrology aspects of this disaster.
I’ll focus on their stupid decisions and dumb PR nonsense.!
{Posting this again,for some reason the other is “on hold” !
after I edited it}.
I deleted where I was denying what you’d found !
I felt like a moron – LOL !
My brain cells are dying off…!
The bad Uranus – Venus thing is real. I’d just forgot I’d even found it and posted it.
Probably that Moon – Uranus aspect is somewhere in the mix too. Although so far sounds unfamiliar.
It’s OK, I just felt bad that I was saying “nooo” and was totally wrong + forgot what I’d even said about it !
I wanted to let you know,
🙂
I’m not a professional astrologer, obviously, but I thought it was interesting that I’d found articles/astrologers who were thinking along similar lines.
Then there are those who report the supposedly-upcoming marriage as “just great”, LOL ! They’re wrong.
She’s also selling her Toronto home and she prepares for the biggest transition of her life: from a private citizen to a royal princess. It’s a huge challenge, but one that Meghan Markle is willing to accept.
Correction;
This is NOT “her house “. She was renting it out after she left her live in Boyfriend when she hooked up with Harry.
This house is being sold by the owners. At it isn’t her house..
LOL. the RF’S PR machine is in full swing eh ?
?Property owners Elizabeth Cabral, a former stylist with Flare magazine, and Kevin O’Neill, put the house, which comes with a detached garage, on the market for $1.395 million.
The two have owned the property for about a decade, and purchased it for $508,000.?
**TORONTO STAR **
ha ha ha !!!!!
And here we go. I just posted5this not but 6 hours ago :
?She got photographed licking her lips…yawn.?
?Princess cheeky! Playful Meghan pokes out her TONGUE in front of adoring crowds as she and pregnant Kate stroll side-by-side while the Royals attend church on Christmas Day ?
https://goo.gl/images/imAKnS
https://goo.gl/images/wxtiwf
https://goo.gl/images/Uc2z2H
https://goo.gl/images/imAKnS
🙂
Look what I found :
? Meghan has had a tumultuous relationship with her dad Thomas Markle, who has stayed out of the limelight since news of Meghan and Prince Harry’s relationship broke.
Samantha Markle, 53, dubbed her estranged half-sister Meghan, 36, the “pushy princess” and Tom Markle Jr, 51, the actress’s half-brother, was arrested for allegedly holding a gun to his girlfriend’s head.
Kit.. Look at this.. I think we know who our stalker is :
?Caroline
25 days ago
Its a shame the comment coven isn’t chiming in here (sigi, pennie and hotmess/ladyhawk)…they have an active fantasy life about William and Harry being gay, so I’m sure they could spin some hilariously comedic nonsense about George now, too?
I heard the wedding will be May 19th 2018, Anyone else care to bet the engagement will break off. I don’t see this wedding happening
Elizabeth, this would be the best thing that happened to the Monarchy.
I thought that Wedding Prince Charles and Camilla was a joke.. This, by far surpasses any castrophe the Crown has faced.
I, personally think this woman is dangerous
? Meghan has had a tumultuous relationship with her dad Thomas Markle, who has stayed out of the limelight since news of Meghan and Prince Harry’s relationship broke.
Samantha Markle, 53, dubbed her estranged half-sister Meghan, 36, the “pushy princess” and Tom Markle Jr, 51, the actress’s half-brother, was arrested for allegedly holding a gun to his girlfriend’s head.
Unfortunately, I think the relationship has been contrived (along with Clueless’ pregnancy) by the senior royals and PR boffins to inject some life into the popularity polls, which were flatlining prior to the appearance of Markle. I wish it were otherwise, but I think it will go ahead.
Hello.. I must apologize for logging on this site.
I can’t get back to CDL. I can access the article and comment section, but I’m unable to make a reply.
It’s like a crap shoot there. Hit or miss with a connection.
Anyhow, about poor Eugenie… I thought she had a paying job.. They both have a track record for doing very little and expecting great dividends on the return.
Then, of all things… She picks some “Charity ” for Rhinos.. I’m sure every homeless and starving person in GB will applaud her efforts.
Who, besides Diana, has ever worked a full time job?
I don’t think Camilla has such a swell track record for permanent, full-time employment.. Before snagging Parker Bowles and then Chunk..
What a worthless bunch.
Then Harry’s O R E O cookie thinks she’s going to be jetting the globe for some worthless cause, while her Father lived in abject poverty in a house with plywood on the windows..
Sometimes I just shake my head
Either way, those girls (York) need some professional help with their public relations and style.
It might be in their DNA – remember what a fashion train-wreck their mother was?
Wait.. We must include Andrew into the fold here.
Hey.. I need to ask you a question.
Harry wants to invite former US President and Mrs Obama to this Wedding.
Well, Teresa May has a strained relationship with out current president.
They say if Parliament says he can’t invite the Obama’s, Harry has to ” suck it up “.. How much power does the Royal Family have and why can’t he invite who he wants ??
Wondering why they exist and what function do they serve if the GOVERNMENT can veto a Wedding guest.. I was quite surprised!!
Quite sure Parliament would have the final say. The royals have a tacit agreement that they will steer clear of politics.
The only substantive power the Monarch has is to dissolve Parliament ( which he or she would never do).The royals are simply an anachronistic hangover from centuries ago when the Monarchy had absolute power. The Monarch is simply a figurehead now, living high on the hog, along with the rest of the bludgers.
Ahhh. Decorations for Kensington, Buckingham, Sandringham, High Grove, Frogmore… Etc.. I’m sure I missed the one that Will &Waity blew a fortune on, then moved back to Kensington..
They are there to make sure they run up the Electric, Water, Gas and Food bills.
Did you know that Queen Elizabeth applied for Heat Vouchers for her “homes “??
She was turned down saying that a Hospital or School could benefit from the voucher more than she.
Yes, I recall when the queen applied for some sort of heating discount! I thought it was absolutely appalling! Fortunately, commonsense prevailed and she was denied assistance. The richest woman in the world needed help paying her heating bill.
Really, the RF serve no purpose except to provide fodder for the tabloids; it’s a real-life soap opera and a ridiculously expensive one.
I just love how this was denied
One of my “buddies ” on another site said *I saw every picture and read every article about this Church Service and I have NEVER saw any pictures of Ms Markel doing any such thing *
I posted every headline from The Daily Mail, Sun, Post, etc with the picture…
She said markel was licking her lips and everything is blown out of proportion .
That was the last post I got from her… Wait until you see another guy in complete denial.. Hang on.. I’ll pull up the article.
Now they are saying her hat looks like the “?poo ” emoji.. I think they’re right.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7bfd761ca758562e5ae19ec8638aec305acc37bac561f5d931c6b9954b71ff8d.jpg
That’s what I thought when I saw it – the colour, the shape – it does look like a big turf.
Hey, HM2..who is this hag?
Look at her comment, to nobody, I must add. I think I know who this stalker is :
?Caroline
25 days ago
Its a shame the comment coven isn’t chiming in here (sigi, pennie and hotmess/ladyhawk)…they have an active fantasy life about William and Harry being gay, so I’m sure they could spin some hilariously comedic nonsense about George now, too.
Oh yes, it’s the troll-from-hell; she also writes under the username – Da Truth. Often wish the world was flat and she’d fall off.
?A senior government source said: “Harry has made it clear he wants the Obamas at the wedding, so it’s causing a lot of nervousness.
“Trump could react very badly if the Obamas get to a Royal wedding before he has had a chance to meet the Queen.
“Conversations are ongoing about and ministers will eventually have to decide. If the PM lays down the law, Harry will just have to suck it up.”⁉
Sorry, HM.. I cannot log into CDL. We are in the midst of a snowstorm, so maybe that’s the problem.
Anyhow, to answer the question about Ms Snarkels vast wealth.. It’s estimated at around 5 Million.. Doesn’t sound like a whole lot, by today’s standards and seeing she was getting paid handsome for her role on SUITS, plus living with her boyfriends saved on rent..
Now she has a private ?ATM
?? wealth-tracking site estimates that she is worth $5 million compared to the ?prince’s $40 million, a sum he’s accumulated from funds left in trust to him by his mother, Princess Diana, an inheritance from the Queen Mother, and his former salary as a captain in the British Army.??
You were asking about that Cocktail dress Snark wore for her 300engagement photos??
Well :
Gear & & & Style
HOME / GEAR & STYLE /
The 1 Reason Why Queen Elizabeth II Might Not Approve of Meghan Markle’s Engagement Dress
Jessie Quinn MORE
December 23, 2017
Up until now, Meghan Markle has followed suit with the royal family’s strict rules (with the exception of publicly showing affection towards her husband-to-be). However, her and Prince Harry’s engagement portraits show side of Ms. Markle’s personal style that goes against how the queen would like the family to be portrayed.
Find out the one reason why Prince Harry’s grandmother may not be the biggest fan of the bride-to-be’s engagement dress, plus the details of Meghan Markle’s engagement dress, ahead.
1. The skirt and top are actually one piece
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle engagement photo
The outfit is actually one piece. | Kensington Royal via Instagram
One of our favorite aspects of Meghan Markle’s engagement outfit? The skirt and top are actually one piece. We love the mix of fabrics and use of texture in her whimsical gown.
2. It was designed by Ralph and Russo
She opted for a British designer. | Kensington Royal via Instagram
While Ms. Markle is known for wearing Canadian designers, she embraced her new country and opted for a British label for her and Prince Harry’s official engagement portrait. The design is from Ralph and Russo’s fall 2017 couture collection and features intricate embroidery detail and a gorgeous full skirt.
3. The embroidery detail
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle engagement photo
The stunning gold embroidery added texture. | Kensington Royal via Instagram
One of the most stunning aspects of the gown is the gold embroidery on the bodice. In an intricate leaf-like pattern, the embroidery gives the gown a unique, detailed texture.
4. The skirt
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle engagement photo
The subtle black ruffles complements the embroidery on top. | Kensington Royal via Instagram
In addition to the bodice, the skirt also features some intricate detailing. Albeit subtle, the black tulle skirt features small ruffles that create a full and textured effect.
Curious to know why the queen may not approve of Meghan Markle’s Engagement dress? Find out, next.
5. Her dress goes against the royal family’s dress code
Neither of them really seem to care though. | Kensington Royal via Instagram
The main reason why the queen might not be fond of Meghan Markle’s engagement dress? It’s not exactly modest. When it comes to attire, the royal family has a strict set of rules about the way they must dress — especially for official portraits like Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s engagement photos.
See why it breaks the family’s style rules, next.
6. The bodice is sheer
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle engagement photo
The sheer fabric looks more like a red carpet dress than one for the royals. | Kensington Royal via Instagram
Perhaps the most shocking detail on her Ralph and Russo gown is the sheer bodice. While it’s long sleeve style may be queen-approved, the sheer fabric and embroidery appliqué adds a sex appeal that we haven’t seen women in the royal family embrace before.
7. The dress has a modest cut, but is very revealing
Meghan-Markle-Prince-Harry-Engagement-3
The skirt was a way to add balance. | Kensington Royal via Instagram
In addition to long sleeves, the full skirt also adds modesty to the design. Perhaps this silhouette was a compromise between her personal style and the royal family style rules.
OK. Look what I just uncovered
? Ms Ragland,( Ms Markle’s Mother) who filed for bankruptcy in 2002, has kept her daughter’s counsel despite the press interest
Unable to work due to her MS, Samantha has suffered financially, as did her father after his career as an award-winning TV lighting director ended.
?Both were declared bankrupt and Samantha challenged her sister on her lack of financial support.Based in Florida, she is 17 years older than Miss Markle and has been an outspoken critic of her since news of her relationship with Harry broke.
In interviews she has described Miss Markle as a ‘shallow social climber’ and claimed she shunned her family since making it in Hollywood.?
I do like it when family members come out and give the inside story – cuts right through the PR B.S.
Our Ms Snarkel is quite the Future Duchess.. Been training all her life :
?.In a recent interview with The Mail on Sunday, Markle’s half-brother
Tom Jr. revealed the siblings’ father, Tom Sr, won an estimated £565,000 ($750,000) in a lottery when the actress was just nine-years-old.?
?That money allowed Meg to go to the best schools and get the best training. Meg is someone who has always had laser focus.
She knows what she wants and she doesn’t stop until she gets it,’ he added?
No need to apologize; I prefer this site. Yes, Diana was the last one to have any strong work ethic. Sophie seems fairly impressive, although I don’t know if she’s a full-time royal.
I, too admire Sophie. She at least has a Charity that actually means something to her… And is very good about spreading the word about treatment, glasses and operations on Eye disorders
I also like Zara Phillips and Mike Tindale.. He has a job and they both seem normal.
From this ➡to this ➡and finally THAT. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9bc4dcc03694182799d508c270b63735238b579866a5599ba2eb564ee364c2b9.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/dd4775bb7da940010c15dabf5288ee2e3b6242a523611dbccd52a51365a5eba3.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7bfd761ca758562e5ae19ec8638aec305acc37bac561f5d931c6b9954b71ff8d.jpg
Hey, HM.. check this out.. I don’t think little 2 year old Charlotte would pull a childish stunt like that
? Meghan playfully sticks out her TONGUE in front of adoring crowds as she and pregnant Kate stroll side-by-side while the Royals attend church on Christmas Day ?
DAILY TELEGRAPH
How mature for a 34/35/36/37-year-old woman. She’s playing the adorably cute Meghan now? Won’t work. That “girlie” behaviour only works until the early 20s, then it’s just embarrassing.
Wait. I got a message saying “she was ‘ licking her lips “‘{. ?She got photographed licking her lips…yawn.? }……Yeah, in sub- zero temperature outside.. Sure, everyone licks their lips with the tongue poking out and Headlines that read :
?Princess cheeky! Playful Meghan pokes out her TONGUE in front of adoring crowds as she and pregnant Kate stroll side-by-side while the Royals attend church on Christmas Day ?
Hey, Ladyhawke.. SIGGY is looking for you.
She’s here on CELEBRATING the SOAPS.
I think it’s the Markel ?hat article.
There are only 4 articles.. So, she’s pretty easy to find.
However, it’s getting quite a few comments. May have move to The Engagement Photos article, where there is only one ( scathing) comment.. By someone not nice!! LOL!
Avatar
KittySiggy PennieP.
3 hours ago
I haven’t seen LH anywhere for a while !
I’ll be VERY busy soon though,
🙁
But I’ll still be here when I can, !!!
Yes I believe Markle is straight-up crazy. Bat sh*t crazy. If you take a real good look at her eyes…..
Yes, I hadn’t noticed what a weird linking creature she is.
NO-ONE PANIC!!!! I’m here.
I think this is the same old Troll on CDL that changes Color every day.
Blue Rhino, purple banjo, orange hat.. You know, she says the same thing over and over.
She’s on Royal Central CONSTANTLY.
I found the photograph of Snark in her Ball gown and Harry in that horrid electric blue suit.
Strolling down a https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0a43186f8449c8ea71488f7b9265474f61cef662da2ef2e32d51974b93e4d259.jpg dirt road in the middle of the day.
As you do…awful blasted photo; the pair look as though they’ve had a skinful of bubbly.
I’ve noticed, in the photos released from the church service, that as well as having a large doodie on her head, Markle looked very much like a rodent.
Then the Press graciously smooths over this gaffe to say she’s “Cheeky and Playful ”
How about downright rude, childish and inappropriate..
I don’t get why they kiss her @$$.
Oh, my god …you’re right. They both look half lit, staggering home from the Pub because they forgot where they parked the car!!
What a caption for the New Year.. Or an ad for UBER™…
And that hanging on his arm and constantly stroking his face, hand, arm, shoulder.. It’s just, ummm.. hard to watch.
Hello Elizabeth.. Sorry for replying here to your comments on CDL, but it cannot log in a reply..
Anyhow, yes.. I do believe QEII has some bats in the Belfry. Either that or Snarkle is spiking granny’s Gin..
I honestly can’t believe Philip is particularly thrilled with this union between Harry and his “fiancé “… I’d have thought he’d have said something… Ummm, outspoken, by now.
Well, we all have a Front row seat to see how this little Melodrama unfolds..
Hey, Elizabeth. Check this out:
? Meghan playfully sticks out her TONGUE in front of adoring crowds as she and pregnant Kate stroll side-by-side while the Royals attend church on Christmas Day ?
DAILY TELEGRAPH
I agree with that.
HA!HA! EXCELLENT!!
The PC “police” will be at the ready to overreact to anything that might/might not cause an issue for the Snark. Absolutely ridiculous. Still don’t understand why royal protocols have been tossed out for this woman. Rather than her presence giving a sense of inclusion to minorities, it may have the opposite effect. The brooch was a non-event that the media couldn’t resist turning into a “newsworthy incident”. The Snark may prove to be a divisive presence long-term.